Get Your Money’s Worth From Civil 3D

Jump Kit

The Framework for Civil 3D
Get More

Templates Only

See The Framework Work
Get More

Become a Member

Master Civil 3D
Get More

Autodesk Civil Videos

Free Civil 3D Training
Get More

Framework Videos

Free Civil 3D Videos
Get More

The Is it Worth it in Civil 3D Paradox demands some of our consideration. Out here in Civil 3D Land there’s an intriguing notion about Autodesk Civil 3D Templates, Civil 3D Styles, and Civil 3D resources development. Is the customization of Civil 3D worth it? This is hardly a toss-up.

One side of the Civil 3D development coin says we must all do the complex customization work to create exactly what we need to get our work done and our published work out the door expeditiously.

The other side of the coin says a lot of that nuanced customization detail appears to be only a matter of preference.

The Is It Worth It in Civil 3D Paradox

I trust that these Civil 3D customization motivations and/or rationalizations are clear to you?

The nature of paradox means the entire thing is a bit nonsensical, contrary, and can be confusing to the unwary.

For Civil 3D development that means it is easy to feel like Marty McFly in Back to the Future.
You remember the tale.

I’ll play the role of the early Doc Brown in the famous movie.
“Be very careful to try not to date your mother before you are born.”
Fictional time travel paradoxes can be uncomfortable.
They do make for a lot of comedic fun too.

Our paradox is not as much fun. Some say it is downright painful.

Heads and Tails
We Win and Lose

It takes a bit of Civil 3D experience to eventually recognize these apparently opposite choices are two sides of two separate and different coins. Huh? Say what? I already said… It’s hardly a toss-up.

In Civil 3D Land we flip both our copper pennies and our silver dollars.

One side of the Civil 3D development coin says we must all do the complex customization work to create exactly what we need to get our work done and published out the door expeditiously.

We must deal with this Civil 3D internal development problem because Autodesk chooses to only provide the absolute minimum level of generic Civil 3D Template, Civil 3D Style, and resources content with their software.

Most folks in Civil 3D Land perceive this minimal level of Template and Style customization and resource support as something personal to them. Well, it is personal. Customization in Civil 3D is necessary to produce and deliver their project work.
Someone must own and perform the customization work.

That experience produces a ‘We must do this work’ mindset.
Put another way…
We must meet our internal levels of perceived satisfaction to make Civil 3D productive.

Manufactured Products like the Framework for Civil 3D demonstrate this perspective is at least partially an illusion of our own making.
We understand that end users tend to focus on the exceptions.
Product manufacturers and managers tend to remain more mindful of the commonalities.

The important question remains:
Do we want to pay for the customization work in dollars or in pennies?

The other side of the customization coin says a lot of the nuanced detail appears to be only a matter of preference.

Plan Set deliverable production is driven by Industry standards, readability, and consistent and repeatable presentation. These factors do matter in our civil engineering and survey projects.

Our Plan Sets must communicate complex engineering and survey information to a lot of different people many with very divergent information needs.
We must learn to be flexible and adaptive.

To put it bluntly - Architects are not Plan Checkers nor are Planning Officials General Contractors.

Human beings tend to see the preferences of others as arbitrary.
We perceive our personal preferences as rational.

We tend to confuse perceived needs of others with their personal preference.

My favorite People Skills quote comes to mind:

We Know People Think Differently.
Do We Behave as if They Do?

It might be more pertinent to replace the Do in the sentence above with Can.

Manufactured Products like the Framework for Civil 3D demonstrate support for a high degree of flexible presentation and surprising levels of adaptability.

We understand that Civil 3D end users tend to focus on the particulars.
Product manufacturers and managers tend to remain to remain mindful of the need for adaptability.

Here’s yet another interesting and paradoxical bit:

The more custom Civil 3D resources we have in hand…
 the easier it is to be and become more flexible and adaptive.

Seems to me that the important question remains:
Do we want to pay for that content in dollars or in pennies?
Just sayin’.

The Powers to Make Civil 3D Work
Get the Framework for Civil 3D